Cases 61 - 70 of 37,882
Devin Kyle Wade v. Central District of California
as 2:2024cv07319
Respondent:
Central District of California
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Devin Wade v. CACD Central District of California
as 2:2024cv07321
Petitioner:
Devin Kyle Wade
Respondent:
CACD Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vester L. Patterson v. Chance Andes
as 2:2024cv07272
Plaintiff:
Vester L. Patterson
Defendant:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01832
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowling v. North Justice Center et al
as 8:2024cv01872
Defendant:
Orange County Public Defender, Unknown Party, North Justice Center and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Dawn Dowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam v. Glen E. Pratt
as 2:2024cv07306
Petitioner:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Respondent:
Glen E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Bratton v. Oak Smith
as 2:2024cv07384
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Petitioner:
Ronald Bratton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dustin Oliver Jones v. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv07396
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Petitioner:
Dustin Oliver Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kordy Rice v. A. Geuping et al
as 2:2024cv07397
Defendant:
A. Geuping, Kenny Price, V. Antandare and others
Plaintiff:
Kordy Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
