Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 11 - 20 of 14,194
LEPORE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00110
Petitioner: JOSHUA J LEPORE
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff: LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Defendant: KELVIN WELLS, JEFFREY E LEWIS, W LAPORTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDDICK v. OSBORN et al
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: QUINTON M REDDICK
Defendant: PAUL OSBORN, KYLE ROWLAND and JAMES COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CISNEROS-GONZALEZ v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: JOSE A CISNEROS-GONZALEZ
Defendant: E HERNANDEZ, ALEJANDRA and ALEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANDELARIA v. FRAIS
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner: RONNIE CANDELARIA
Defendant: DAISY FRAIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVIS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner: ROBERT JAMES DAVIS
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IRVIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner: PHILLIS IRVIN
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SOLOMON v. BRAHAM et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff: RICHARD CARNELL SOLOMON
Defendant: BRAHAM and J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. POWERS et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff: LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant: POWERS, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYNN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00253
Petitioner: JOHN BUFORD LYNN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?