Cases 11 - 20 of 14,189
CISNEROS-GONZALEZ v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
JOSE A CISNEROS-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
E HERNANDEZ, ALEJANDRA and ALEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNSIDE v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
DARRELL DARRON BURNSIDE
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, ADAM SUTTON and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOLOMON v. BRAHAM et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARNELL SOLOMON
Defendant:
BRAHAM and J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IRVIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
PHILLIS IRVIN
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LYNN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
JOHN BUFORD LYNN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MAKENDY v. SUMMERS et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
ALFRED MAKENDY
Defendant:
W SUMMERS, MAJOR CHILDS, T MCCROWSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYDE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS and ANGELA LILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. POWERS et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant:
POWERS, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. WALKER et al
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVEN PRICE
Defendant:
DANIEL WALKER, JOHN OSBOURNE and FELICIA VICKERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CULL v. USA
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
LEONARD CULL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
