Cases 41 - 50 of 14,183
GASTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
CARLOS JOSE GASTON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. GADSDEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
ROBERT LEE JONES
Respondent:
GADSDEN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOUCHTON v. PADGETT et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TOUCHTON
Defendant:
DEAN PADGETT and RICKY MAZINGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEATLEY v. STAPLES
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
TERENCE EDWARD WHEATLEY
Defendant:
BONNIE HANNA STAPLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
ELIAS FOSKEY and JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STATE OF FLORIDA v. COTTRELL
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MURNAHAN v. ORANGE COUNTY COURT et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
CHESTER ROBERT MURNAHAN
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY COURT, TED MARRERO, HEATHER NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL and JAMES SKIPPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
