Cases 1 - 10 of 14,194
HUGGINS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
KINARD DONALD HUGGINS
Respondent:
RICKEY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
KEITH PERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOWRIE v. MCCOLLOUGH
as 5:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
NAAFIZ K LOWRIE
Defendant:
MCCOLLOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUDDICK v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE R RUDDICK
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and LEON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
RAEQWON S MOTON
Defendant:
JONES, WESTBURY, DUVALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWER v. OKALOOSA COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BREWER
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY, WALTON COUNTY, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. BARNES et al
as 5:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
KAREN K WALKER
Defendant:
BARNES and KIMBREL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLIMAN v. WATKINS et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
OBIE DYWANE HOLLIMAN
Defendant:
K WATKINS, COMMISSIONER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MENTAL HEALTH DOCTOR HOLMES CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
