General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,864
Lindsey v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner: Kyle Jordan Lindsey
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edison v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv01800
Petitioner: Jermaine A Edison
Respondent: A Thomas, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01795
Petitioner: Michael Renaldo Turner
Respondent: Timothy Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner: Ronald B. Gray
Respondent: Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillanos v. State of Georgia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01656
Petitioner: Eduardo Castillanos
Defendant: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner: Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent: Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batten v. McBurney
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff: Emory Batten
Defendant: Judge McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner: Jonathan Hill
Respondent: Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roller v. State of Georgia, Warden
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff: Jackie Ray Roller
Defendant: State of Georgia, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. White
as 1:2024cv01570
Petitioner: Jamar Scott
Respondent: Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?