Cases 41 - 50 of 4,458
Vlietstra v. Starkey et al
as 1:2024cv03379
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Vlietstra
Defendant:
Eric M Starkey, Andrew Watts, Derek Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sistrunk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03393
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M. Sistrunk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Transit Authority, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. Carlson
as 3:2024cv50153
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Judy Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demus v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
James Demus
Defendant:
Alfredo Maldonado, Anthony Plaid, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv50144
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General and McHenry County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Calvin Blunt, Jeffrey Hanssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Common v. Beauty Supply Owner et al
as 1:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Common
Defendant:
Beauty Supply Owner and Occupant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Office of the Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dampier v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Ray Timothy Damper and Ray Timothy Dampier
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sebastien A Magiera, J.D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Alegria et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
A Alegria, T Berecz and J Guevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
