Cases 111 - 120 of 23,861
Pope v. Chattik et al
as 3:2024cv50172
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. Pope
Defendant:
Nurse Chattik and Dr. Larry Sy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balzan v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Reyes Balzan
Defendant:
CCDOC, Tom Dart and CCDOC Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nefer Neb v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
Ken Nefer Neb and Darrell McKee
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John or Jane Doe, Iris Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv03670
Plaintiff:
Arron Marko Thompson
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03674
Plaintiff:
Dmitri D. Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, D. Griffin and G. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Lofgren et al
as 1:2024cv03618
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre D Moore
Defendant:
M Lofgren, Yuhas, T Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Facility Dixon C.C. et al
as 3:2024cv50173
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Facility Dixon C.C., Construction Trade Worker, Contract Incorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50165
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Larive v. Metropolitan Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv03585
Plaintiff:
Shannon Larive and Metropolitan Correction Center
Defendant:
John Officer Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
