Cases 121 - 130 of 3,944
Crain v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00710
Petitioner:
Durell T Crain and Durell Crain
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miles v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00682
Petitioner:
Ronnie Miles
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larkin v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2023cv00685
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larkin v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2023cv00686
Petitioner:
Jeffrey E Larkin
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00677
Petitioner:
Jerry A Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphries v. Sheriff
as 2:2023cv00249
Petitioner:
Donte Humphries
Respondent:
Warden and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00672
Petitioner:
Kevin D White
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00667
Petitioner:
Dontay Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dimmett v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00663
Petitioner:
David A Dimmett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
