Cases 71 - 80 of 11,320
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02834
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jackson v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2024cv02812
Plaintiff:
CHEVEZ A. JACKSON
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Nassau County Sheriffs Department, Nassau County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Long Tuminello, LLP et al
as 2:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
Elmer Garcia
Defendant:
Long Tuminello, LLP, Richard I. Horowitz and Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browne v. Zebro et al
as 1:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
P.O. James J. Zebro, P.O. Mark P. Shackel, P.O. Anthony P. Guidice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morris v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv02696
Plaintiff:
Howard Morris
Defendant:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCray v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2024cv02698
Plaintiff:
Donald McCray
Defendant:
Catherine Wolfe and Kiyo Matsumoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon et al v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02557
Plaintiff:
David Gordon and Lystra Reyes
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Nassau County, Lt. Sean G. Correale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Volant, et al v. News 12 Long Island
as 2:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Scange Volant and Imani Rochester
Defendant:
News 12 Long Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amirouche v. USA
as 1:2024cv02596
Petitioner:
Larby Amirouche
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kaye v. McGunnes
as 1:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kaye
Defendant:
Thomas T. McGunnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
