Cases 81 - 90 of 11,320
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. USA
as 1:2024cv02555
Petitioner:
Daniel Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reeves v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02408
Plaintiff:
Michael Reeves
Defendant:
The city of New York, The City of New York Police Department, Detective John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
York v. King
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Donnell D. York
Respondent:
M King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ayala v. NYC Human Resources Administration et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ayala
Defendant:
NYC Human Resources Administration, Jamie Esparza, El Paso District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DeFritas v. Kubetz et al
as 2:2024cv02368
Plaintiff:
Russell DeFreitas
Defendant:
Jacob Kubetz, John Doe, Anthony Senft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumpter v. Bassett et al
as 2:2024cv02303
Plaintiff:
Terrence Sumpter
Defendant:
Jason Bassett and Anthony Senft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denton v. Nadel et al
as 2:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Denton
Defendant:
P.O. Brian Nadel, P.O. Andrew Schuerlein, Det. Robert Henaghan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
