Cases 41 - 50 of 2,728
Rahaman v. Bennett
as 9:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Cendno Rahaman
Respondent:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hightower v. The State of New York
as 9:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Darren Hightower
Respondent:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hooper v. Cook
as 9:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Jordon Hooper
Respondent:
Amy Cook, St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, St. Lawrence County Supreme Court District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Jovan Wilkins
Respondent:
Mark J. Miller and The Attorney General of New York State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Justice Center
as 9:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Respondent:
Onondaga County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mothersell v. Hood
as 9:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Robert M. Mothersell
Respondent:
Todd Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Lilley
as 9:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
David J. Decker
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Lowerre
as 9:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Wardell Watson
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. NYS DOCCS
as 9:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Murray Hall, III
Respondent:
NYS DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.