Cases 41 - 50 of 7,384
Ford v. USA
as 1:2024cv00288
Petitioner:
Markeith Ford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Marcum v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
as 2:2024cv02645
Petitioner:
Jennifer L Marcum
Respondent:
Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Titus v. Davis
as 2:2024cv02641
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Respondent:
Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Middletown Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
City of Middletown Police Department, John Doe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODRUFF v. STATE OF OHIO
as 2:2024cv01416
Petitioner:
JONATHAN L. WOODRUFF
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Willis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
George Willis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jarmon v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00278
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Jarmon
Respondent:
Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02364
Petitioner:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Respondent:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
