Cases 81 - 90 of 6,367
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arrington v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Derrek E Arrington
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and DESIGNATION, SENTENCE, & COMPUTATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Lonnie Love
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe, D Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Gardner et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Andreil R Berry
Defendant:
FNU Gardner and Lawton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Charles R Bowlds
Defendant:
Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Tim Laughlin, Cindy Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Truitt v. OIG et al
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
OIG and FNU Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00214
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gravlee v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee
Defendant:
FNU Tibbs, FNU Prince, FNU Kala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
