Cases 41 - 50 of 7,271
Arsenault v. NEW YORK LIFE GROUP BENEFIT SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv02244
Plaintiff:
John Arsenault
Defendant:
NEW YORK LIFE GROUP BENEFIT SOLUTIONS and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SU v. 1 HEART HOME HEALTH CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
1 HEART HOME HEALTH CARE, LLC and ADILA SLAUGHTER
THOMPSON v. DIMENSIONS GROUP SERVICES
as 2:2024cv02231
Plaintiff:
YENDA THOMPSON
Defendant:
DIMENSIONS GROUP SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
JAMES v. MCMANUS et al
as 2:2024cv02232
Defendant:
CITADEL CREDIT UNION, LINCOLN INVESTMENT, TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA-COLLEGE RETIREMENT EQUITIES FUND and others
Plaintiff:
MOJIRADE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
MACKLIN v. AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL
as 2:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
SYEED MACKLIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL doing business as FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
TANCREDI v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
BARBARA TANCREDI
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BARNES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
TAMEKA A BARNES and TAMEKA BARNES
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
SU v. INDEPENDENCE ADMINISTRATORS
as 2:2024mc00016
Petitioner:
JULIE A. SU
Respondent:
INDEPENDENCE ADMINISTRATORS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CAIRNES v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2024cv02162
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP also known as UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA doing business as UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN CAIRNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
