Cases 31 - 40 of 5,389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DURSO v. HIG GROUP INC
as 2:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
JOHN DURSO
Defendant:
HIG GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Trucksmarter, Inc. v. PLS LOGISTICS SERVICES
as 2:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Trucksmarter, Inc.
Respondent:
PLS LOGISTICS SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MCCOMBS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Thomas McCombs, Jr.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk Souther Railway Systems, Norfolk Southern Railway Systems Lines and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KEMMERER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
David Kemmerer
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
JOHNSTON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Patricia Johnston
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
