Cases 71 - 80 of 11,084
Riley et al v. Slusher et al
as 3:2024cv00860
Defendant:
Cpl. Justyn Rhodes and Cpt. Corey Slusher
Plaintiff:
Jose Bonelges Guillen Alonso and Aaron Samson Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renfro et al v. Conrad et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Defendant:
Thomas Conrad, (F/N/U) Burton, (F/N/U) Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wallace, Khadree Renfro and Vaughn Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loyde v. Phillips
as 3:2024cv00852
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Phillips
Petitioner:
Mack Mandrell Loyde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singleton v. Nashville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00841
Defendant:
Nashville Police Dept., Tennessee State Police, Nashville, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Tina Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00840
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Kena Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00826
Petitioner:
Frederick Turner, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Maddin, III v. Nelson
as 3:2024cv00824
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Petitioner:
Homer Alson Maddin, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleek, III v. DCSO et al
as 3:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
William Sidney Cleek, III
Respondent:
DCSO and Darren Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley Jr v. Rudd Medical Services et al
as 3:2024cv00827
Defendant:
Charles Fynn, John Rudd and Rudd Medical Services
Plaintiff:
Randolph Bradley Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
