Cases 1 - 10 of 19,677
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. McPeters et al
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Vasquez
Defendant:
Udealor McPeters and Veronica Sierra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Anekwe
as 5:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Senior Chaplin Paul Anekwe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debnam v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Kevin Debnam
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galindo v. Midland Police Department et al
as 7:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
David Galindo
Defendant:
Midland Police Department, Magistrate Judge and Midland Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00615
Petitioner:
Gerald Wilson Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newson v. Wiles
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Devoris Antoine Newson
Defendant:
Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shows Urquidi v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00192
Petitioner:
Arturo Shows Urquidi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
