Cases 71 - 80 of 265
Brown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05645
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Brown
Defendant:
The City of New York, The State of New York, Marcus McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fardella v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv05373
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher Fardella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Majdanski v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2013cv04483
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Majdanski
Defendant:
Rosa and Gerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Lee
as 1:2013cv04353
Petitioner:
Rafael Rodriguez
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv03507
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Santana v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03034
Plaintiff:
Pedro Santana
Defendant:
The City of New York, The City of New York Department of Corrections, New York City Health Services, Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tirado v. Shutt et al
as 1:2013cv02848
Plaintiff:
Miguel Tirado
Defendant:
B. Shutt, S. Holiday and R. Lassiter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Griffin
as 1:2013cv01977
Petitioner:
Martin Hodge
Respondent:
Patrick Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sergio Medrano v. USA
as 1:2013cv01604
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sergio Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Santana v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01549
Plaintiff:
Pedro Santana
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services P.C., Wanda Smithson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
