Cases 11 - 20 of 24,373
OUYIN TECH CAPITAL LLC, v. SILVERGATE BLOCKCHAIN LTD CO. et al
as 3:2024cv07047
Defendant:
MING ZHOU, SILVERGATE BLOCKCHAIN LTD CO., RHY BLOCK CHAIN LTD. CO. and others
Plaintiff:
OUYIN TECH CAPITAL LLC,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
AMAZON.COM, INC. et al v. YARLEQUE et al
as 2:2024cv07046
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON.COM LOGISTICS, INC.
Respondent:
CINTHIA YARLEQUE and CHARLES BAKER
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
APOTEX INC. v. AMARIN PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07041
Plaintiff:
APOTEX INC.
Defendant:
AMARIN PHARMA, INC., AMARIN PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LIMITED and AMARIN CORPORATION PLC,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. BOROUGH OF WANAQUE et al
as 2:2024cv07001
Plaintiff:
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WANAQUE and BOROUGH OF WANAQUE PLANNING BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Johnson County, Tennessee v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06973
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Johnson County, Tennessee
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cocke County, Tennessee v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06980
Plaintiff:
Cocke County, Tennessee
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
