Cases 21 - 30 of 785
Baer v. Bizxchange, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jon R. Baer
Defendant:
Bizxchange, Inc., Bob Bagga, Thomas J. Degan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fahey v. Douglas County et al
as 3:2008cv01168
Plaintiff:
Paul David Fahey
Defendant:
Douglas County, Douglas County Sheriff's Department, Chris Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fagans v. Nooth et al
as 6:2008cv01158
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Fagans
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, S. Hodge, Robert Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Deleon v. Marion County Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2008cv01153
Plaintiff:
Xavier Juan Deleon
Defendant:
Marion County Correctional Facility, Aramark Corporation and Beverly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Nooth et al
as 3:2008cv01138
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Young
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, Max Williams, Hardy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bennett v. Erickson et al
as 3:2008cv01128
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bennett
Defendant:
Marie Erickson, Chase and Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhnhausen v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2008cv01107
Plaintiff:
Michael Kuhnhausen, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Portland, Steve Ober, Michael Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Jacoby et al
as 3:2008cv01100
Plaintiff:
Conrad Nichols
Defendant:
J. Jacoby, Jason Emert, Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karboau v. Nooth et al
as 6:2008cv01081
Petitioner:
Milaudi Karboau
Respondent:
Mark Nooth and Max Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saleh et al v. Thomas et al
as 3:2008cv01069
Plaintiff:
Hamdi Saleh and John Does 1-33
Defendant:
J.E. Thomas, Cain, Mahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
