Copyrights Cases filed in Michigan between July 1, 2006 and July 25, 2007
Cases 31 - 40 of 78
UMG Recordings, Incorporated et al v. Phillips
as 2:2007cv10858
Plaintiff: UMG Recordings, Incorporated, UMG Recordings, Incorporated, Interscope Records and others
Defendant: Ryan Jason Phillips
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Atlantic Recording Corporation et al v. Crowder
as 4:2007cv10856
Plaintiff: Atlantic Recording Corporation, Atlantic Recording Corporation, UMG Recordings, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Debra Crowder
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Capitol Records, Incorporated et al v. Starke
as 2:2007cv10863
Plaintiff: Capitol Records, Incorporated, Capitol Records, Incorporated, UMG Recordings, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Willie Starke
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kramer v. Quinn
as 1:2007cv00175
Plaintiff: Ron Kramer
Defendant: Robert R. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lalewicz v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv10507
Plaintiff: Paul Lalewicz
Defendant: DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, J. R. Thompson Company and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Crystal Computer Support, Incorporated v. Hough Consulting Services, Incorporated et al
as 1:2007cv10285
Plaintiff: Crystal Computer Support, Incorporated
Defendant: Hough Consulting Services, Incorporated, Hough Consulting Services, Incorporated, Shiawassee Area Transportation Agency and others
Counter Claimant: Hough Consulting Services, Incorporated and Shiawassee Area Transportation Agency
Counter Defendant: Crystal Computer Support, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Stiles Machinery, Inc. v. Corbis Corporation
as 1:2007cv00043
Plaintiff: Stiles Machinery, Inc., Stiles Machinery, Inc. and Stiles Machinery, Inc.
Defendant: Corbis Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?