Cases 141 - 150 of 101,314
Dunaway et al v. Antique Lighting Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
James Dunaway and Carol Dunaway
Defendant:
Antique Lighting Solutions, LLC, Anthony Hadaway and Cadogan Tate New York Limited
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law, PLLC v. Meneses Law Firm PLLC et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law, PLLC
Defendant:
Meneses Law Firm PLLC and Juan Pablo Diaz Cuenca
Khan et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv02169
Plaintiff:
Zahoor Khan and Jalwa Naseem
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00763
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Grovano Inc. v. ROCKET ENTERPRISES, LLC.
as 5:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Grovano Inc.
Defendant:
ROCKET ENTERPRISES, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rehman v. GPM Investments LLC
as 3:2024cv01391
Petitioner:
Harriett Louise Rehman
Respondent:
GPM Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
