Cases 51 - 60 of 24,409
OUYIN TECH CAPITAL LLC, v. SILVERGATE BLOCKCHAIN LTD CO. et al
as 3:2024cv07047
Defendant:
MING ZHOU, SILVERGATE BLOCKCHAIN LTD CO., RHY BLOCK CHAIN LTD. CO. and others
Plaintiff:
OUYIN TECH CAPITAL LLC,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CM ASHLAND CONSTRUCTION CORP.
as 2:2024cv07054
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
CM ASHLAND CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AMAZON.COM, INC. et al v. YARLEQUE et al
as 2:2024cv07046
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON.COM LOGISTICS, INC.
Respondent:
CINTHIA YARLEQUE and CHARLES BAKER
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
APOTEX INC. v. AMARIN PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07041
Plaintiff:
APOTEX INC.
Defendant:
AMARIN PHARMA, INC., AMARIN PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LIMITED and AMARIN CORPORATION PLC,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
