Cases 171 - 180 of 6,768
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
David Leyva, Johny Gomez, R. G. and others
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces, Felipe Hernandez, Jeremy Story and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leyva et al v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 2:2023cv00952
Plaintiff:
David Leyva, Johny Gomez, R. G. and others
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces, Felipe Hernandez, Jeremy Story and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petersen v. Keller et al
as 2:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Dave Eric Albert Petersen
Defendant:
Tim Keller, City of Albuquerque Metro Bus Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yearley v. Loves Country Store #285 et al
as 1:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
Janie Lynn Yearley
Defendant:
Loves Country Store #285, Bill Morrison and Derek Rusinek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nissen v. POTUS
as 1:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Michael James Nissen
Defendant:
POTUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spilsbury v. Demchok
as 2:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Spilsbury
Defendant:
Vera Demchok, Carice Demchok and Seth Demchok
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. State of New Mexico
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Las Cruces
as 2:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jovan Jones
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
