Cases 1 - 10 of 11,547
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Archuleta
as 1:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Mr. Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Deputy Joseph Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bivings (PS) v. Arapahoe Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Kayla S. Bivings
Defendant:
Arapahoe Department of Human Services, Darlene Locke and Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison
as 1:2024cv01677
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Intlekofer v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2024cv01678
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Intlekofer
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sholes v. City Council of the City of Craig Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
Tanner Sholes
Defendant:
City Council of the city of Craig colorado, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MOFFAT COUNTY COLORADO,, Chip Mcintyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01636
Plaintiff:
Elijah Smith
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Mike's Restaurant Group doing business as Hayter's & Co. and Adam Glasby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Chybinski v. Kragt et al
as 1:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chybinski
Defendant:
Amanda Kragt and Stephen Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
