Cases 41 - 50 of 921
Cash v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv24588
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Cash
Defendant:
Fabyiah Barnett and Octavia Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAVEZ-ARRIETA v. DOE
as 0:2023cv61898
Plaintiff:
OSCAR CHAVEZ-ARRIETA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Michael P. and Mike Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Ayre v. Does 1-9
as 1:2023cv24341
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ayre
Defendant:
Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Sabag v. Just Vision, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv24324
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sabag
Defendant:
Just Vision, Inc., Naked Edge Films Ltd., Ro Co Films International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Takefman v. The Pickleball Club LLC et al
as 1:2023cv24252
Plaintiff:
Earl Takefman
Defendant:
The Pickleball Club LLC and Matthew Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Moon and Star Logistics, LLC v. Direct Traffic Solutions, Inc.
as 9:2023cv81300
Plaintiff:
Moon and Star Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Direct Traffic Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ayre v. Does 1-9
as 1:2023cv24340
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ayre
Defendant:
Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Ayre v. Does 1-9
as 1:2023cv24339
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ayre
Defendant:
Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Markle v. Markle
as 8:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Samantha M Markle and Samantha M. Markle
Defendant:
Meghan Markle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Briffa v. Beal
as 6:2023cv01837
Plaintiff:
Kyler Briffa
Defendant:
Bradley Beal, Washington Bullets, L.P. dba Washington Wizards, Lincoln Holdings, LLC d/b/a Monumental Sports Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
