Cases 31 - 40 of 7,252
WILLIAMS v. TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Badalamenti v. Meisenhelder et al
as 3:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Cara Badalamenti
Defendant:
Hayleigh Meisenhelder and Gary Meisenhelder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Blalock v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff:
Carol Blalock
Defendant:
U S POSTAL SERVICE and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
KHOURI v. NARDELLA
as 5:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
HEIDI KHOURI
Defendant:
PERRY NARDELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Huber v. Safeco Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Ali Huber
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Webster v. Troup et al
as 2:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
Stacey Webster
Defendant:
Davonna Troup and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Vazquez v. Covin et al
as 2:2024cv01990
Plaintiff:
Joshua Vazquez
Defendant:
Kyle Covin, ADT, LLC doing business as ADT SECURITY SERVICES and ADT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Yohe et al v. Highlight Motor Group Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Frank Yohe and Dementria Yohe
Defendant:
Highlight Motor Group, Inc. and Yuri Grebennikov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WILLIAMS et al v. BOWERS
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAMS and MARY JO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
COHEN et al v. CITRENBAUM-PERKINS
as 2:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
LENARD COHEN and LAUREN COHEN
Defendant:
REBECCA CITRENBAUM-PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
