Cases 81 - 90 of 7,066
Risner v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11998
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Plaintiff:
Paul Risner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chamberlain v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv12003
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Plaintiff:
Jerel Chamberlain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roten v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2024cv12005
Plaintiff:
John D. Roten
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lumbrazo v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv12007
Plaintiff:
Michael Lumbrazo
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11978
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS and Covidien LP
Plaintiff:
Christy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frank et al v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11973
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Plaintiff:
Robert Frank and Coreen Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bedow et al v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11968
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS and Covidien LP
Plaintiff:
Gary Bedow and Marlene Bedow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Talbot v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11967
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS and Covidien LP
Plaintiff:
Steven I. Talbot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Helsdingen v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11955
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Covidien, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Helsdingen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Platt v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2024cv11940
Plaintiff:
Marion A. Platt
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
