Other Fraud Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 81 - 90 of 878
Chang v. Silvani et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff: Charles Chang
Defendant: Mary Silvani, John Silvani and Clifford Q. Cabansag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Freund v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv02003
Plaintiff: Miriam Freund
Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dethrow v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01997
Plaintiff: James Dethrow
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clayton v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01996
Plaintiff: Sheri Clayton
Defendant: The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Delcid v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01999
Plaintiff: Otto Delcid
Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Owens v. Jameson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02001
Plaintiff: Jordan Owens, r
Defendant: Michael Jameson, Willis Law Firm LLC and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aviles et al v. Proctor & Gamble Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01950
Plaintiff: Eileen Aviles, Shelby Cooper, Tanya Cooper and others
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lyle v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01925
Plaintiff: Reese Lyle
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Canaday v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01926
Plaintiff: Haley Canaday
Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Toporek v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01927
Plaintiff: Michael Toporek
Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?