Cases 81 - 90 of 18,474
Rabold v. Hayes et al
as 6:2024cv01580
Defendant:
Amanda Faye Hayes and Janis Hunt
Plaintiff:
Joshua-Wayne Rabold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00410
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
TERESE EBONY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pantle v. Crawford et al
as 6:2024cv01591
Defendant:
Melanie Freeman Chase and Charles G. Crawford
Plaintiff:
Shad Douglas Pantle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Tampa
as 8:2024cv02074
Defendant:
City of Tampa
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WISER v. BLUE STREAK LLC
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Brandy Wiser
Defendant:
Blue Streak, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
SCHOFIELD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD SUI JURIS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
HOBBS SOUTH HOLDINGS LLC v. HOBBS et al
as 5:2024cv00196
Defendant:
HOBBS GLOBAL TRUST ESTATE TOUSSANT THOMPSON, OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS ESTATE, WIDOWS PEAK SETTLEMENT AGENCY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HOBBS SOUTH HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bain v. Kollra et al
as 0:2024cv61601
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bain
Defendant:
Ernest A. Kollra and Edward H. Merrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
v. Toxqui Ortiz et al
as 1:2024cv23315
Defendant:
Lester Salces, Eleri Zetina De La Llave and Rubicelia Toxqui Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Toxqui Ortiz v. Salces et al
as 1:2024cv23316
Plaintiff:
Rubicelia Toxqui Ortiz
Defendant:
Maria Elena De La Llave De Zetina, Eleri Zetina De La Llave and Lester Salces
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
