Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Vilfrard v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis CO., LPA
as 7:2015cv00429
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blowers v. Lerner, Esq. et al
as 1:2015cv00889
Plaintiff:
Andrew Blowers
Defendant:
Andrew S. Lerner, Esq. and Gregory B. Walz, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jive Communications, Inc. v. Communiclique, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00794
Plaintiff:
Jive Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Communiclique, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. The CFS Group, LLC
as 2:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
The CFS Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. U.S. Port Services, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
U.S. Port Services, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
U.S. Port Services, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Intercarats, LLC, v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.,
as 2:2014cv00625
Plaintiff:
Intercarats, LLC,
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bristol Compressors International, Inc. v. Fig Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00006
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Moreno v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jaime Moreno
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Corporation , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Equity Trustees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lighthouse Inflatables, LLC v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00662
Plaintiff:
Lighthouse Inflatables, LLC
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Virginia Fuel Corporation
as 2:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Virginia Fuel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
