Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Paladino v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00728
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Paladino
Defendant:
Atlas Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Property Damage
Panther II Transportation, Inc. v. Five Star Direct, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Panther II Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Five Star Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Jack v. Dawson
as 5:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Jack
Defendant:
Cutler Dawson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Baugh Northeast Co-Op, Inc. et al v. Clipper Exxpress Company
as 5:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Baugh Northeast Co-Op, Inc. and Sysco Corp.
Defendant:
Clipper Exxpress Company and Clipper Exxpress Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Groves v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shawn Groves
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boles v. Destination Movers, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Anne Boles
Defendant:
Destination Movers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelly v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01327
Plaintiff:
Louise Kelly
Defendant:
Allied Van Lines, Inc., West End Moving and Storage, Inc. and Bayshore Transportation System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Estes Express Lines, Inc. v. CGS Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00752
Plaintiff:
Estes Express Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
CGS Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. City of Alexandria et al
as 1:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
City of Alexandria and Richard Baier
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Van Lines, LLC v. Padron
as 1:2008cv00064
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Honorio Padron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
