Cases 111 - 120 of 4,843
Yargee v. Rogers
as 4:2023cv00501
Petitioner:
David Yargee
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wright
Respondent:
Gentre Drummond and Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butler v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seals v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Michael Dwayne Seals and Michael Dwayne Washington
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hunter v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01096
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Hunter
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logsdon v. Cassidy
as 6:2023cv00420
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr.
Respondent:
Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kolosha v. Rogers
as 4:2023cv00481
Petitioner:
Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brewer v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Renel Anthony Brewer
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Eric Kitch and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joice v. Rogers
as 6:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Brian Fredrick Joice
Respondent:
Mike Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butler v. Ledbetter
as 6:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
