Cases 81 - 90 of 9,260
Woods v. Bossier Medium Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Herman Woods
Defendant:
Warden Bossier Medium Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Cupp
as 5:2024cv00671
Defendant:
A Cupp
Plaintiff:
Wynston Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winbush v. Lofton
as 5:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Javonpe' D Winbush
Defendant:
Judy Lofton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Cupp
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Wynston Scott
Defendant:
A Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
St. Cyre v. Myers
as 2:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Ronald St. Cyre
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey and Carlos Devon Lewis
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dowles v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00652
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Plaintiff:
Desi Lamont Dowles, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00645
Defendant:
Warden
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriff Whitehorn, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Avist v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Avist
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
