Cases 81 - 90 of 19,730
Johnson v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04531
Plaintiff:
Norman Johnson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Dr. Marlene Henze, Bryan T Chua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenderson v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Amos Fenderson
Defendant:
Payton Helfrich, Christian Munoz, Russell Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv50200
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Defendant:
Leavenworh Penitentiary, Warden D. Hudson, McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv04514
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County, Lt. Wiggins, Deputy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Jail/D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv04517
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Jail/D.O.C., Deputy Manzella, Response Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. De la Rosa et al
as 1:2024cv04519
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
De la Rosa and Limpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff's Record Dept et al
as 1:2024cv04529
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Record Dept, H Sorte, Kiuilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
