Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Morales et al v. Kusmenko Kustom Farming et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Lara Morales and Oscar Gerardo Cuellar Sandoval
Defendant:
Kusmenko Kustom Farming and Jason Kusmenko
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sangster v. University of North Dakota
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sangster
Defendant:
University of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Seekings et al v. Rod's Quality Collision Center
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Christopher Seekings and Rebecca Seekings
Defendant:
Rod's Quality Collision Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller v. Bell Energy Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Shawn Miller
Defendant:
Bell Energy Services, LLC and Dakota Petroleum Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Terry v. Kriehn & Associates LLC
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Matthew Terry
Defendant:
Kriehn & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Knutson v. EPIC Management, LLC
as 3:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Joye Knutson
Defendant:
EPIC Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Toulou v. Chippewa Resources Incorporated
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Chase Toulou
Defendant:
Chippewa Resources Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Olson v. Queen City Pizza, LLC
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Thomas Olson
Defendant:
Queen City Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Knight v. Hawk Eye Flowback, LLC
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Bryson Knight
Defendant:
Hawk Eye Flowback, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
