Cases 51 - 60 of 632
Shaw v. Emory University et al
as 1:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Corey Russell Shaw
Defendant:
Emory University and Professor Gari Clifford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Cook v. Lookout Mountain Community Service Board
as 4:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sherry Cook
Defendant:
Lookout Mountain Community Service Board doing business as Bridge Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Baker v. McDonough
as 1:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Connie Baker
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rueff v. Global Industrial Company
as 1:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Patrick Rueff
Defendant:
Global Industrial Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Wehunt v. Empire Care Centers, LLC
as 1:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Tony Wehunt
Defendant:
Empire Care Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Gai v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Fatimatou Gai
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Fendley v. HydroExcavators, LLC
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Scott Fendley
Defendant:
HydroExcavators, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
HAYES v. QSI OF GEORGIA LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
RECO HAYES
Defendant:
QSI OF GEORGIA LLC doing business as QSI LLC doing business as QSI SANITATION and GLENN JONES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Taylor v. Athena Health, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jada Taylor
Defendant:
Athena Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Knight v. Americold Logistics, LLC
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn K. Knight
Defendant:
Amerigold Logistics, LLC and Americold Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
