Cases 201 - 210 of 363
Florida Tower Partners, LLC et al v. Tamworth, Town of et al
as 1:2011cv00546
Plaintiff:
Florida Tower Partners, LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
Tamworth Planning Board, Town of and Tamworth, Town of
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996
USA v. Ring
as 1:2011cv00536
Respondent:
Joseph Ring
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Carrell v. GC Services, LP et al
as 1:2011cv00528
Plaintiff:
Nathan Carrell
Defendant:
DLS Enterprises, Inc., GC Financial Corp. and GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Senecal
as 1:2011cv00397
Respondent:
David Senecal
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Stoddard, Town of, et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Intervenor:
Barbara Amrein and James Amrein
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
Stoddard, Town of and Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Town of Stoddard, NH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic et al v. NH Department of Health and Human Services, Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Catholic Medical Center, Cheshire Medical Center, Core Physicians, LLC and others
Defendant:
NH Department of Health and Human Services, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Manchester et al
as 1:2011cv00334
Defendant:
City of Manchester and Zoning Board of Adjustment, City of Manchester
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
USA v. Rollins
as 1:2011cv00315
Respondent:
Joseph A. Rollins
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
USA v. Parenteau
as 1:2011cv00208
Respondent:
John M. Parenteau
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
USA v. Healey
as 1:2011cv00142
Respondent:
Gerard Healey
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
