Cases 81 - 90 of 162
SCOTT v. REDMAN
as 2:2015cv00903
Plaintiff:
NORMA SCOTT
Defendant:
DONALD REDMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. PARKER
as 2:2015cv03189
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
SHEILA M. PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission et al
as 1:2015cv00855
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gibson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and United Water PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prison Legal News et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News , Daniel Denvir , Philadelphia City Paper and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Amicu:
Amy B Ginensky and Eli M. Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROM v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv01518
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN M. STROM
Defendant:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, KATHLEEN KANE and ANNETTE TIERNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLHOUSE et al v. GORELL et al
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
CINDY A. ALLHOUSE , TAMMY S. ARBLE , JAMES M. BLAIR and others
Defendant:
WAYNE GORELL and BRIAN ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania v. Wallin
as 4:2013cv02566
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Kenneth Jason Wallin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
PALLADINO et al v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv05641
Plaintiff:
CARA PALLADINO and ISABELLE BARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS W. CORBETT and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Pennsylvania Game Commission
as 1:2013cv01939
Plaintiff:
Kathy Davis and Hunters United for Sunday Hunting
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Game Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEANGELO v. NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
DALE DEANGELO
Defendant:
NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP and DAN STRIMEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
