Cases 71 - 80 of 5,572
Chapman v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chapman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bobbit v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Bobbit
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fowlkes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Cecil Fowlkes, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Matthews v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Renae Matthews
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yurich v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Michael Yurich
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lawrence v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Greta B. Lawrence
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ray v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Sabrina D. Ray
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sherman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Capati v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
LaConya Vaughan Capati
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kampf v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lyle Brent Kampf
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
