Cases 1 - 10 of 870
Buckley v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Not Yet Classified:
Tasha Carver
Plaintiff:
Dameion Buckley
Defendant:
Henderson County and Zachary Jeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Amicucci v. Franklin County Board of Elections
as 2:2024cv02032
Plaintiff:
Alexander Q. Amicucci
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cynthia Brown, et al v. David Yost
as 24-3354
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA BROWN, CARLOS BUFORD and JENNY SUE ROWE
Defendant:
DAVID YOST, In his Official Capacity as Ohio Attorney General
General Sessions Court of Davidson County, et al v. El
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
General Sessions Court of Davidson County and Teresah M. Pinho
Defendant:
Koree Brooks El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
John Doe (RWC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RWC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. LaRose
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Tariq Shabazz
Defendant:
Frank LaRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McKamey v. Skrmetti et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Russ McKamey
Defendant:
Jonathan Skrmetti and Carter Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGory et al. v. City of Sandusky, Ohio
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Blake McGory, Elaine McGory, Ernest Ettore and others
Defendant:
City of Sandusky, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
