Cases 101 - 110 of 11,700
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Britton v. South Bend City of
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
William R. Britton
Defendant:
City of South Bend and South Bend City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SINGH v. THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
CHAMKAR SINGH
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, USCIS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Peck v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Marcus LaShawn Peck
Defendant:
William J Nelson and Marion County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Hammond City of et al v. ASARCO Master Inc
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Indiana, City of Whiting, Indiana, Hammond City of and others
Defendant:
ASARCO MASTER, INC. and ASARCO Master Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
