Cases 81 - 90 of 10,164
S2 Growth I LLC v. Romulus Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10398
Plaintiff:
S2 Growth I LLC
Defendant:
Romulus Capital Management, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth III LP, Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kline v. Primis Bank
as 1:2024cv10929
Plaintiff:
Robert Kline
Defendant:
Primis Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Heinz v. Customer Contact Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv11001
Plaintiff:
Austin Heinz
Defendant:
Customer Contact Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Darla v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10786
Plaintiff:
Norah P Darla
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lopez et al v. Orange Lantern, Inc.
as 3:2024cv30035
Plaintiff:
Arianny Celeste Lopez, Abigail Ratchford, Andra Cheri Moreland and others
Defendant:
Orange Lantern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Das et al v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10931
Plaintiff:
Abhijit Das, Mitra Das, Dr Mukti Das and others
Defendant:
Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, David Wallace, John Pratt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Desmond v. Wallin
as 1:2024cv10411
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
