Cases 11 - 20 of 46,370
Mancone et al v. WebTPA Employer Services LLC
as 3:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Connor L Mancone and Alexandria Mancone
Defendant:
WebTPA Employer Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vargas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MANCHA, JR. v. NURI EXPRESS, LLC
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
GILBERTO MANCHA, JR.
Defendant:
NURI EXPRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Loeb v. Vo et al
as 4:2024cv01891
Plaintiff:
Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb
Defendant:
Anh Xuan Vo and Isha Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kline v. Target Corporation
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Sharoen Kline
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hogberg et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Travis Hogberg and Audrey Rodriguez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jackson v. Parkland Memorial Hospital
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Sir Gregory P. Jackson
Defendant:
Parkland Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Minor v. Parwala Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Sterell Minor
Defendant:
Parwala Transport, Inc., Guru Ji Transport, LLC, Bulldog Freightway, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Munoz v. Madrid et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Javier Munoz
Defendant:
Dominic Madrid and Hector Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Lyft Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01192
Defendant:
John Doe, Lyft Inc and Traik
Plaintiff:
Romell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
