Cases 91 - 100 of 10,259
Mullins v. Powers et al
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mullins
Defendant:
Samantha Powers, Kent J Dawson, Judge, Joseph Went and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Motley v. J. Manzanedo #17753 et al
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Courtney Motley
Defendant:
J. Manzanedo #17753, Carlos Silva #18356, Jeri Dermanetian Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Eikenberry
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Andrea Wood
Defendant:
Kevin Eikenberry, Clement Holdings and SGT Investments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Venter et al v. Nye County
as 2:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Willem Christoffel Jacobus Venter and Robert James Hutchison
Defendant:
Nye County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lemus v. Clark County School District et al
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lainez Lemus and G.R.L.
Defendant:
Clark County School District, Dr. Jesus F. Jara, Ronnie Guerzon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Burton v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Precious Burton
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, AT & T, Theodore Diaz Torress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
