Cases 121 - 130 of 10,401
ROSEMOND v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
GARRY ROSEMOND
Defendant:
PAMELA B. WASHINGTON and KIMBERLY SMITH
SMITH v. UNITED STATES TREASURY et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TREASURY, BANK OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
PROVOST et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
WENCESLAUS PROVOST, JR and ANGELA PROVOST
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
CHAMBERS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
CARISSA CHAMBERS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SNOWDEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL SNOWDEN
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METRO TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DAVIS # 892 and others
SEDITA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
GIUSEPPE SEDITA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
ADENARIWO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
ADE ADENARIWO, THERESA BROOKS, DENINE EDMONDS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
