Cases 141 - 150 of 10,413
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al v. UDR, INC.
as 1:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Intervenor:
Ms. G. and Ms. M.
Defendant:
UDR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
SOOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
EMERY SOOS
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and WALT C. DANNENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL V. BEAIRD
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
LORETTA HILLWARE, LORETTA HILL and LORETTA RANDOLPH
Defendant:
JOHN BEAIRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
SWANSON v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SWANSON
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
PROVOST et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
WENCESLAUS PROVOST, JR and ANGELA PROVOST
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024mc00032
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
