Cases 81 - 90 of 10,494
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
NEIBAUER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv02266
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILHELM NEIBAUER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COPELAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Defendant:
DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as DAVID A. HUBERT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD RUSSELL COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
YZAGUIRRE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01828
Defendant:
PAMELA A. SMITH and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
G & D LLC, SECOND AMENDMENT INSTITUTE and TYLER YZAGUIRRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02227
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
TADESSE v. JACKSON FBI AGENT et al
as 1:2024cv02212
Defendant:
FAY STETZ, OREGON STATE AND OFFICIALS, CHASE TEDROW and others
Plaintiff:
YODIT DAGNE TADESSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
