Cases 101 - 110 of 10,321
Taylor v. Wooten
as 2:2024cv01241
Defendant:
James Wooten
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. ARMARK Corp.
as 3:2024cv01243
Defendant:
ARMARK Corp.
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dwayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reedy v. Reyes et al
as 6:2024cv01240
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, Sgt. Campos, C/O Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Reedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Albany City Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv01242
Defendant:
Wheels Financial Group, Francine Wheeler and Albany City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Travis Lane Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2024cv01216
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
D'Arius Akim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knox v. O'Donell et al
as 3:2024cv01223
Petitioner:
Steven Knox
Respondent:
Nicole M. O'Donell and Multnomah County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Issac v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv01222
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Hiedi Miller, J. Bugler and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Issac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. USA
as 1:2024cv01203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Norman Bruce Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
DelaRosa v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael DelaRosa
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins et al v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 6:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Rufus Washington, Tim Aiken, Billy Grissle and others
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
